![]() ![]() Historian Peter Moore notes that Thomas Jefferson’s indelible phrase has had a vibrant afterlife, becoming shorthand for the American dream. Poet and cultural critic Patrick Mackie tackles this topic with a beautifully written and insightful series of essays that connect the biographical details of Mozart’s life with some two dozen of his musical works.ĩ Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, by Peter Moore Historians and musicologists have sought to explain Mozart’s genius and enduring appeal for more than 200 years. The story plumbs the depths of forgiveness, and how cowardice can morph into bravery. Aquino, and his contemplative present in a nursing home. Winsome and wise, historical and original, the first-person account bounces among Lito’s childhood, his final outing with the retired Mrs. Nathan Go’s splendid debut novel follows Lito, a Filipino chauffeur for Ferdinand Marcos-era opposition leader-turned-president Corazon Aquino. Nilima Rao delivers a slow-boil, effective whodunit that exposes exploitive colonial practices. Spurred to act, Akal uncovers suspects, secrets, and injustices among the sugar cane fields. Reassigned to the “backwater colony” in 1914 following a career misstep in Hong Kong, the Sikh lawman drags through his days until an Indian indentured worker goes missing. ![]() Akal Singh, dispirited and homesick, abhors Fiji. It is simply common sense,” said the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight earlier this month. Justice Sonia Sotomayor has not recused herself from court cases involving publisher Penguin Random House, which has paid her millions in book royalties.“A demand for ethical constraints is not an attack on the Court or any single justice. That should change, say some experts, given the allegations against Justice Alito and recent revelations about gifts to Justice Clarence Thomas from billionaire Harlan Crow.This isn’t about attacking the court’s conservative majority, some insist. ![]() Singer had any interest in the cases before the court, he insisted.There’s been a code of conduct for federal court judges since 1973, but the Supreme Court isn’t bound by it. Singer’s hedge fund in a lawsuit that ultimately netted it $2.4 billion.Justice Alito has denied that he did anything wrong. In a prebuttal in The Wall Street Journal published prior to ProPublica’s release of the story – an unusual step – he said that the trip was personal hospitality, and thus he didn’t need to report it. In 2014, justices voted 7-1 in favor of Mr. That may have violated a federal law that requires justices to disclose most such gifts, according to the ProPublica story.Nor did Justice Alito recuse himself when cases involving businesses of the billionaire, Paul Singer, came before the court. Is it time for the Supreme Court to have a detailed, binding code of ethics?That’s a question sparked by the recent report from ProPublica that in 2008, Justice Samuel Alito took a luxury fishing trip to Alaska on a billionaire’s private jet.Justice Alito did not report the trip on his financial disclosure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |